Dbq Although New England and the Chesapeake Region Were...

Wa’Nyah Tucker 11A September 24, 2012 DBQ ESSAY Question: Although New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely by of English origin, by 1700 the region had evolved into two different societies. Why did this difference in development occur? Thesis Statement: When talking about New England and the Chesapeake region, you have to consider the differences in motives and geography. Consider economic situations (reasons for settling where they did, reasons why they came to New England in the first place). One has to think about the family development and demographics, as well as the government structure. Thought New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled with a majority of English origin. By 1700 the†¦show more content†¦The main crop being produced in this area was tobacco. There was such high demand for tobacco, it eventually cause the soil to become try old and tired. By the soil drying out it increased the need for new land. In Document B on the list of emigrant bound for New England, it is mostly family oriented. Families were coming and units. These people were mostly the Puritans who were coming to New England for religious purposes. The New England colonies were founded as examples of pure religion. The New Englanders would come to prosper through their hard work, thrift, and the quality of their commitment to God and each other. The Christian values of charity towards another man resulted in tight knit communities that embraced the idea to care for every member. John Winthrop wrote, A Model of Christian Charity, while he was aboard the Arbella on the A tlantic Ocean in 1630. In this writing he states that no matter what social class you fall under everyone must say close together and work in unison as one man. Not as many men working but coming together. Showing the affection one would give to their brother. One must make their fellow colonist conditions their own, whether it is good or bad. Laugh together, cry together, rejoice together, mourn together, work together and even suffer together. They are as â€Å"a city upon a hill†. Meaning that other colonies will see what they do. They will notice everything they doShow MoreRelatedAlthough New England and the Chesapeake Region Were Both Settled Largely by People of English Origin, by 1700 the Regions Had Evolved Into Two Distinct Societies. Why Did This Difference in Development Occur?784 Words   |  4 PagesAlthough New England and the Chesapeake region were both settled largely by people of English origin, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. Wh y did this difference in development occur? AP U.S history DBQ #2 8/28/12 The New England and the Chesapeake regions were both from English origin. However, they had completely different societies. Each settlement had different intension of why they wanted to settle in the new world. New England and Chesapeake colonies had

Definition and Examples of Monologues

A monologue is a  speech or composition  presenting the words or thoughts of a single character. (Compare with dialogue.) Someone who delivers a monologue is called a monologuist or monologist. Leonard Peters describes a monologue as a dialogue between two people. One person speaking, the other listening and reacting, creating a relationship between the two (Demystifying the Monologue, 2006). Etymology From the Greek, speaking alone Examples and Observations It was the first day off in a long time, and all of us were trying to get a little rest and relaxation out by the pool at this big, modern hotel that looked something like a prison. If I had to call it anything I would call it a pleasure prison. It was the kind of place you might come to on a package tour out of Bangkok. Youd come down on a chartered bus — and youd probably not wander off the grounds because of the high barbed-wire fence they have to keep you in and the bandits out. And every so often you would hear shotguns going off as the hotel guards fired at rapid dogs down along the beach on the Gulf of Siam.But if you really wanted to walk on the beach, all you had to learn to do was pick up a piece of seaweed, shake it in the dogs face and everything would be hunky dory.(Spalding Gray, Swimming to Cambodia. Theatre Communications Group, 2005)A monologue is a predominantly verbal presentation given by a single person featuring a collection of ideas, often loosely assemb led around one or more themes. Note that I do not define it as a strictly verbal presentation; many, though certainly not all, successful monologuists also employ nonverbal elements to great effect, such as, their use of facial expressions and hand gestures, along with a variety of props and stage devices.(Jay Sankey, Zen and the Art of the Monologue. Routledge, 2000) Monologues and Dialogues A conversation is a dialogue, not a monologue. Thats why there are so few good conversations: due to scarcity, two intelligent talkers seldom meet.​  (Truman Capote)There is no such thing as conversation. It is an illusion. There are intersecting monologues, that is all. We speak; we spread round us with sounds, with words, an emanation from ourselves. Sometimes they overlap the circles that others are spreading around themselves. They they are affected by those other circles, to be sure, but not because of any real communication that has taken place, merely as a scarf of blue chiffon lying on a womans dressing table will change colour if she casts down on it a scarf of red chiffon.​  (Rebecca West, There Is No Conversation. The Harsh Voice, 1935) Two Versions of Hamlets Famous Monologue (Modernized Spelling) 1603 Version (Bad Quarto) To be, or not to be, aye theres the point, To die, to sleep, is that all? Aye, all. No, to sleep, to dream, aye, marry, there it goes, For in that dream of death, when we awake, And born before an everlasting judge, From whence no passenger ever returned, The undiscovered country, at whose sight The happy smile, and the accursed damned. But for this, the joyful hope of this. Whod bear the scorns and flattery of the world, Scorned by the right rich, the rich cursed of the poor? The widow being oppressed, the orphan wronged, The taste of hunger, or a tyrants reign, And thousand more calamities besides, To grunt and sweat under this weary life, When that he may his full quietus make, With a bare bodkin, who would this endure, But for a hope of something after death? Which puzzles the brain, and doth confound the sense, Which makes us rather bear those evils we have, Than fly to others that we know not of. Aye that--O this conscience makes cowards of us all. 1604-1605 Version (Second Quarto)To be, or not to be, that is the question:Whether tis nobler in the mind to sufferThe slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,And by opposing end them. To die, to sleep —No more--and by a sleep to say we endThe heartache and the thousand natural shocksThat flesh is heir to! Tis a consummationDevoutly to be wished. To die, to sleep —To sleep--perchance to dream: ay, theres the rub,For in that sleep of death what dreams may comeWhen we have shuffled off this mortal coil,Must give us pause. Theres the respectThat makes calamity of so long life:For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,The oppressors wrong, the proud mans contumely,The pangs of despised love, the laws delay,The insolence of office, and the spurnsThat patient merit of the unworthy takes,When he himself might his quietus makeWith a bare bodkin? Who would fardels bear,To grunt and sweat under a weary life,But that the dread of som ething after death,The undiscovered country from whose bournNo traveller returns, puzzles the will,And makes us rather bear those ills we haveThan fly to others that we know not of?br/>Thus conscience does make cowards of us all,And thus the native hue of resolutionIs sicklied over with the pale cast of thought,And enterprises of great pitch and momentWith this regard their currents turn awryAnd lose the name of action.(William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act Three, scene 1) The Lighter Side of Monologues You know, there are some things that are actually harder to do with two people. Like, monologues.(Tina Fey as Liz Lemon in 30 Rock, 2006) Pronunciation: MA-neh-log Also Known As: dramatic soliloquy Alternate Spellings: monolog

Standard vs. Automatic Compare Contrast Essay Free Essays

Jacob Phaneuf 10-20-12 Eng 101 (Compare Contrast) When buying a new car, many people do not stop to think about what kind of transmission that they would like. While most cars today come in automatic versions, there are also five and six speed standard transmissions available on most car models. While certain people may not even know how to drive a standard transmission, it is not the popular choice, but for the people who enjoy using both feet to drive there is always the option. We will write a custom essay sample on Standard vs. Automatic Compare Contrast Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now While most cars on the road today are automatics there are still ups and downs to both transmissions, standards may last longer, but automatics are easier to use and more convenient. Standards are usually sportier then the everyday persons automatic car, but they can also save on gas, and can be a little quicker compared to the same exact same automatic transmission model. While driving a standard can be a nightmare for some, others enjoy this feeling very much. Being able to drive with two feet is a very odd thing to be able to get used to, and also having a third pedal. This added third pedal is called a clutch, and must be pressed every time the vehicle switches gears, where as in a automatic the transmissions switches gears unnoticeably and requires no action from the driver. While having the control to be able to tell a vehicle what gear to go into when ever you want too, gives the car a much sportier feel, but also makes the vehicle a lot more fun to drive and also a little quicker off the start. Driving a standard is only for certain people though, while to others it may seem easy, learning to drive a standard can be a difficult task and if not done right can result in stalling or even permanent car damages. Having many things to remember to do while driving a car can be a frustrating thing to have to do, but thankfully there are automatic transmissions, which has many more conveniences and is much easier to use and drive then a standard car. Driving an automatic requires only one-foot operation and a computer does all the gear switching electronically. Automatics are the most popular choice when purchasing a car, because they are so simple, easy, and can also be fun to drive. While driving a standard can be a lot more fun, it can also be a lot more stressful considering there are things to always be aware of. Staling is something that is very easy to do and can happen for a few reasons, the clutch was released too quickly, or the transmission was left in gear when the clutch was removed. Also traffic can be a very stressfully thing to deal with in a standard because of the constant use of two feet moving every time the car must move forward. Hills can also be a major challenge for even the most experienced standard transmission drivers. When on a hill, the vehicle will be able to roll backwards until the driver has successfully engaged first gear, but stalling is still a great possibility and can cause big problems for an inexperienced driver. When it comes to choosing the right transmission, be sure you will be able to drive the vehicle the proper way, if not then at least have a person available to teach the proper ways. While both transmissions are great ways to drive, one driver may prefer one over the other, they both drive differences but will both get you to the same place. The only major difference to remember is that a standard transmission can be a lot more work, and the driver has to be ready to deal with the frustrations of a standard transmission. Happy driving! How to cite Standard vs. Automatic Compare Contrast Essay, Essay examples

God the Father Annotated Bibliography

Question: Give a breif discussion on annotated bibliography on God the Father? Answer: Channing, W. E. (2014).Unitarian Christianity. Netlancers Inc. This book is about the only father or master of the Christians, that is no one else rather than Jesus Christ, His teachings - either inspired by His Apostles or during His personal ministry. The principles are sometimes misunderstood by the common people as they may not understand the inner meaning of His teachings, but are blindly following them all as the principles of Christianity. Thus, in this book, the author tried to make people understand that The Bible was written by people, for the people, in their language, so that its meaning is clear to all and can establish a better society and finally a better world. Ehrman, B. D. (2014).How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee. This is the book section or citation from the book How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee, written by Bart D. Ehrman. The citation mainly focuses on the believes of the people, which transferred a man to god. The man was Jesus Christ who was a crucified peasant and belonged to a lower-class Jewish family. In the early life, the author was a believer and in later days, he became a historian of early Christianity and has approached the matter in his book, such that it becomes useful to both secular historians and believers of the religion. Buggert, D., Carm, O. (2013). God the Father in the Trinity.New Theology Review,13(1). This journal is mainly concerned about the term Father, which the Christians generally utter in their prayer In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. The author of this journal made a research about the first person of the Trinity to whom the whole religion of Christianity is referring as Father, that is, the God. Jesus Christ is the lord. Then another question arises about the Son. Thus the whole journal is a research work of the identification of the Father and the Son. United Church of God,. (2015). God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. Retrieved 26 June 2015, from https://www.ucg.org/booklet/fundamental-beliefs/god-father-jesus-christ-and-holy-spirit According to this website, the religion Christianity has only one Lord, only one Father, who exists eternally as a Spirit, a personal being of supreme knowledge, justice, intelligence, love, authority and power. He is Jesus Christ, the Creator of the world and heaven. For Him only, the life exists in the earth both flora-fauna and human beings. He is the Origin of life. By Jesus Christ, the God made the world as the God came in the form of human being, taught His men and created the nature. Mozley, J. K. (2014).The impassibility of God. Cambridge University Press. The purpose of writing this book is primarily historical. This is an attempt to state the believe of the people regarding Gods incapacity for suffering, more over to examine and evaluate the belief. The reason for believing has thrown some focus on the beliefs, has serve to an extent as a criterion for appraising their worth. According to the view point of the Christian tradition, the idea of suffering God has been discussed in this book. Kasper, W. (2012).The God of Jesus Christ: New Edition. Bloomsbury Publishing. This book is formulated after 25 years for answering to the questions of the general people, as in these two decades, an enormous change in the society took place. The changes which took place in the field of cultural, political, religious, and intellectual in these two decades have been discussed by the author in this new version of the book. The author has mainly put his concentration in solving the problems and has put his own view point regarding the problems. The author has disclosed the existential and pastoral meaning of the doctrine of God. According to the author, common people can talk about the God, only when they can speak directly to Him. Dobson, J. C. (2012).When God doesn't make sense. Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.. This book was written to uphold Jesus Christ, the Lord of the Bible and to encourage the Christians when God do such things, which makes no sense to men. Generally people get depressed, get overly discouraged. That is the cause of writing this book, such that men should not misunderstand the Lord, as He sometimes makes people suffer and face dilemmas. Thielicke, H. (2015).The waiting Father: Sermons on the parables of Jesus. The Lutterworth Press. To characterize the parables of Jesus Christ, as the Gods picture book, the book was written. The author here tried to tell the common people that all the harvest, far countries, flowers, birds etc are creation of the Lord Jesus. Thus, study of explanatory world is not needed as the terrestrial world could only answer to all these.